In most states, employers are required to purchase insurance for their employees from a workers' compensation insurance carrier. In some states, larger employers with enough assets are allowed to self-insure, or act as their own insurance companies, while smaller companies (with fewer than three or four employees) are exempt.
When a worker is injured, his or her claim is filed with the insurance company (or self-insuring employer), which pays medical and disability benefits according to a state-approved formula. Unless they fall within limited, exempt categories, employers without workers' compensation insurance are subject to fines, criminal prosecution, and civil liability.
See FindLaw's Workers' Compensation Basics section for additional articles.
There may be instances where you may sue your employer instead, but workers' compensation is considered the exclusive remedy for workplace injuries in most states. This is why failure to provide workers' compensation insurance coverage can result in steep sanctions against the offending employer, including:
In addition to providing workers' compensation coverage, in most states, employers must perform some, if not all, of the following duties:
Although workers' compensation laws provide remedies to injured employees, they also protect employers, as they are designed to be the only remedy that injured employees may seek from their employers. Even so, employers often appear to frown on employees who file workers' compensation benefit claims, and some blatantly discriminate against such employees.Â
To protect employees from employers who discriminate against, harass, or unjustly terminate injured employees, most states prohibit employers from punishing, discriminating against, or discharging employees who exercise their rights under workers' compensation laws, and allow employees to bring civil actions against their employers for the tort of "retaliatory discharge."
If an employee believes he or she has been discriminated against or discharged in retaliation for exercising rights under workers' compensation laws, he or she may have a claim against his or her employer for retaliatory discharge. In a retaliatory discharge suit, the employee must convince a judge or jury that it was more likely than not that he/she was wrongfully terminated. However, the employee does not have to prove that the workers' compensation claim is the sole reason for the discharge. The test is usually whether the employer's action is rooted substantially or significantly in the employee's exercise of rights under workers' compensation laws.
Besides termination, retaliation may take the form of more subtle types of discriminatory treatment, such as demotion or salary reduction. Injured employees are protected from discriminatory conduct immediately after an injury and before a formal workers' compensation claim is filed. An employee's cause of action may be successful even though all the employee did was give notice to the employer of a claim.
Workers' compensation claims involve several different parties and can get quite confusing for non-lawyers. If you believe your employer is not taking care of its workers' comp responsibilities, you may need to assert your rights through legal action. To get a sense of where you stand and what your next moves should be, it may be a good idea to speak with a workers' compensation lawyer.