Glenn Katon is an experienced litigator who has handled numerous trials and appeals. His practice has focused on plaintiffs’ civil rights for the last ten years, preceded by over ten years of commercial litigation. He has litigated racial profiling, immigrants’ rights, police misconduct free speech, and religious freedom cases, and been quoted on civil rights law in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Newsweek.
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
California
Since 2012
New York
Since 1993
Professional Experience
2016 - Current
Katon.Law
Attorney
Civil rights litigation practice.
2012 - 2016
Muslim Advocates
Legal Director
2006 - 2011
ACLU of Florida
Senior Attorney
2002 - 2006
Bush Ross, P.A.
Shareholder
Education
St. John's University School of Law
J.D. (1992)
Awards
year - Glenn Michael Katon
Outstanding Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division
Contacts
Katon.Law385 Grand Ave Suite 200 Oakland CA 94610Telephone: (510) 463-3350Fax: (510) 463-3349
DemocracyNow.org - Eight American Muslims from New Jersey have filed a federal lawsuit calling on the New York City Police Department to stop its surveillance and intelligence-gathering program that targets Muslim and Arab communities. Under the controversial program, New York City police officers monitored the daily life of Muslims in the tri-city area and across the Northeast -- including where people ate, prayed and even where they got their hair cut. We speak to Glenn Katon, Legal Director at Muslim Advocates, the group that filed the lawsuit. "When the NYPD says basically all Muslims are suspect, it seems clear to us that that violates equal protection of the law," Katon says.
To watch the complete weekday independent news hour, read the transcript, download the podcast, search our vast archive, or to find more information about Democracy Now! and Amy Goodman, visit http://www.democracynow.org/
Glenn Katon speaks to City Council of St. Petersburg, FL. During his three minutes of allotted time he explains the legal realities of the situation. He explains they should not vacate the sidewalk and even if they do the sidewalk will still legally remain a free speech area. (My interpretation, Leonard Schmiege) Please study the issue your self. Thanks